ICD-10 Documentation Tips That Reduce Audit Risk

Introduction

Accurate ICD-10 coding depends heavily on clear, complete provider documentation. Inadequate or vague documentation is one of the most common causes of audit findings, claim denials, and compliance risk.
The following documentation tips can help reduce audit exposure while supporting accurate code assignment.


Why Documentation Matters for ICD-10

ICD-10-CM requires a high level of specificity to accurately reflect patient conditions, severity, and clinical context. Auditors evaluate not only the codes assigned, but whether documentation clearly supports medical necessity, condition status, and provider assessment.

Strong documentation protects providers, coders, and organizations during audits and reviews.


Tip #1: Ensure Diagnoses Are Clearly Assessed

Diagnoses should reflect conditions that are evaluated, monitored, or treated during the encounter.

Best practice:
Avoid coding conditions that are merely listed in a problem list without current relevance. Documentation should indicate clinical assessment or management during the visit.


Tip #2: Capture Specificity Whenever Documented

ICD-10 allows for detailed reporting of laterality, acuity, and anatomical detail.

Best practice:
If documentation supports specificity, assign the most specific code available rather than defaulting to unspecified codes.


Tip #3: Confirm Causal Relationships Are Explicit

Certain ICD-10 combination codes require a documented relationship between conditions.

Best practice:
Assign combination codes only when the provider clearly documents a causal relationship. Avoid assumptions based on clinical knowledge alone.


Tip #4: Avoid Coding Historical or Resolved Conditions

Audits frequently flag conditions that are no longer active or relevant to the encounter.

Best practice:
Code only conditions that are current and clinically relevant. Use “history of” codes appropriately when supported.


Tip #5: Review Copy-Forward Documentation Carefully

Cloned or carried-forward notes can include outdated or inaccurate information.

Best practice:
Verify that documentation reflects the current visit and accurately supports the diagnoses being coded.


Common Documentation Pitfalls

  • Vague terms such as “stable” without clinical context
  • Problem lists copied forward without update
  • Diagnoses mentioned without assessment or plan
  • Lack of specificity when documentation supports it

Final Takeaway

Clear, specific documentation is the foundation of compliant ICD-10 coding. By applying consistent documentation review practices, coders can reduce audit risk, improve accuracy, and support stronger clinical data integrity.

Scroll to Top